Radio W4KAZ

Thanks for stopping by the virtual KazShack. Feel free to comment - I often approve them.

BPFF – Untangling the Web – Part 2

So, lots of interesting material to read through listed in BPFF Part 1, and much of it is available via the internet. Catch the whole series of w4kaz band pass filter musings.

This project is not really new for me but just something that was recently underscored by recent operations. Deciding which projects to tackle became a matter of choosing those that I thought are ‘possible’. For these purposes ‘possible’ is defined as

  • the parts or substitutes are readily available
  • the construction appears simple enough for clumsy fingers
  • the final tuning is simple

These criteria knocked out the W3NQN filter and the N1AL because I thought tuning the multi-filar toroidal inductors would be enough to exceed my level of patience. The W3NQN design is well recommended functionally, I just thought the tuning procedures were going to prove too difficult. As a side note, the Toroid King sells a kit of the required toroids for the W3NQN filter, and the DL2BNU article describes a method of tuning that is simpler than using a VNA (that I don’t have). The N1AL design bothers me because of the taps on the multi turn inductor and the trial and error tuning. The ARRL sidebar on the N1AL project is interesting, stating that the filters interact to give nulls on the even harmonics. Curious.

A couple of years back, I built the K4VX filters. That project is relatively simple. Tuning can be done with an MFJ antenna analyzer or using a grid dip method. My own analyzer seemed sufficient, and I was able to build filters for 80m, 40m, and 20m fairly simply. The 160m was more difficult to tune and I never achieved a good SWR. It is now being used on the receive antenna to filter out nearby broadcast QRM from 680 and 850 on the AM dial.

The first real problem I ran across came when the 20m filter was mistakenly put into a high SWR load. FUBAR! The damage manifests itself as a high SWR into the dummy load, and the resonances have changed. I suspect the toroids were damaged by overheating. The capacitors used were silver mica’s, and their values seem unchanged.

Another filter project recently bubbled up through the dogpile stream of data. I ran across the NVARC “Ugly” filter project. Besides having a good write up, their project is billed as a “no tune” design.

So far, that seems to be mostly correct. I’ve had success with the two assembled so far. The 20m filter came in with a resonance a bit low, but the loss through it is in the area of about .5db. No tuning required. The 15m filter is actually centered right at 21Mc, and the SWR is dead flat at 1:1 across the entire 15m band. It’s showing insertion losses of about .7db. I have not yet given either of them any on-air trials, so that’s coming later, but the transmit smoke tests into the dummy load(three one minute intervals, 15 seconds apart) showed very little heating in any of the components. After cutting power, the hottest components were just barely warm to the touch. Sweet.

Not so sweet with the first attempt on the 10m version. It originally showed a resonance around 27.500 with an SWR above 2:1 at the lowest. The NVARC document had a discrepancy, which has since been corrected. Re-building the filter as specified in the updated instructions corrected the resonance. It is now good over most of 10 meters – the SWR minimum is around 28.500, and is about 1.4:1 at the bottom of the CW segment, but the insertion loss is low, only about .5db. A look at their VNA sweep shows that it is resonant at the high end of 10m and above. My rendition shows a double dip minimum in the SWR, one centered on 28.500 and a second broader dip at 31.500. Their VNA sweep of the SWR on their filter is very similar to my own SWR plot taken with an MFJ-259, so I declared my reproduction a success.

The NVARC filters are made with air wound coils, using common schedule 40 PVC pipe sections as the coil forms. The guidelines for winding the coils are fairly accurate, and I didn’t really have any problems winding nice, tight coils. The winding process IS a bit hard on the hands, but not impossible. It might be difficult for someone suffering from arthritis. Post winding testing of a set of the coils with K4CZ’s LCR meter showed the inductances on each to be quite close to the value specified on the Ugly Filter schematic.

It occurred to me that the NVARC filter designs might be built just as easily using toroidal cores. It should be simple enough to use an air wound set to come up with resonance values for each section. That will allow for easy rough tuning, similar to the K4VX method. I guess they could then be fine tuned for maximum smoke with an RF probe and a multi-meter. If the air wound design seems to have good performance, I may try one out with toroids. But credit must be given W1XP and the NVARC crew – these filters are easy enough to re-produce, and none of the three required any sort of tuning.

Ultimately I would like to have a pair of each type NVARC and K4VX on 40m and 20m to test forsuitability. For the time being, its a project on hold to gather resources. I gotta get on the 160 mod for the K2, not to mention re-painting thefasciathe roofers had to fix last month when installing the new roof on the QTH.

Note: There will be a bit of a time gap in this “BPFF” series. I have several other projects going on, and of the radio related items I really need to get on the K2 160m option.

First in series: Band Pass Filter Fever – The Tangled Web – Part 1

Next in series: Band Pass Filter Fever – The Guinea Pigs – Part 3.

Yeah Baby

N4YDU passed on this link to pile-up audio from D4C. Sounds like fun. Its a pile up from 2001, back when DX was being propagated via an ionized atmosphere, all courtesy of the brightest star in the daytime sky.

Break out the contest gris-gris….Hope springs eternal.

Hard Sky – Fifty Years Later

Interesting that the “Hard Sky” of 1958 coincided with the creation of the first working integrated circuit. While “dumpster diving” in the vastness of the newly available QST archive, I ran across “After Sunpots, What” by W6NLZ (ARRL members only). There has been an additional 50 years of observations since then, but it is an interesting perspective on which to becomeacquainted.

This bottomless pit of QST history is pretty interesting too.

Band Pass Filter Fever – The Tangled Web – Part 1

Amended 3/25/2012: Again – re-Fixed broken links, added new links for VK4EMM and KG4JJH reference material

———————————— Begin original Post ————————————-

On occasion I’ve noticed I have a tendency to get wrapped up in an idea I can’t shake. Obsessed might be a close description despite the negative connotations. It’s not quite an obsessive mania, nor is it complete fixation. Perhaps fascination is closer to the truth. A “passionate fascination” sure sounds better than “obsession”. Not much difference semantically, but there it is.

Oddly enough, the most recent subject of interest is band pass filters for HF. (Reeks of geek, no?) Conjured by both this year’s(2008) Field Day and the IOTA operations, it is something I became interested in out of need. Commercial filters are available. It also seems that it is still possible to home brew decent band pass filters for relatively low costs. There are several designs widely available. Using coaxial stubs is also an option.

Homebrew is more fun, and in this case, possibly even less expensive. The difficult part of the problem for me is a simple method for tuning the filters. I don’t have access to a lot of test equipment. Also, some of the designs are easier to build than others. Selecting appropriate parts is also a bit of a problem in some cases.

Ideally, a good band pass filter will have a low insertion loss over the pass band, and a high level of rejection outside the pass band. I’m no Werner Von Einsteeen electronics whiz, but there are going to clearly be some trade-offs there somewhere. So knowing your application can guide you to deciding which trade-offs are appropriate.

A look at commercial filters is also helpful. It i$ certainly ea$ier to buy off the $helf filter$. Filters are available from Dunestar, I.C.E., and the W3NQN filters from Array Solutions. I’ve also run across a set of high power filters, but can’t find the link. EU I think. 4O3A also has a version of high power filters.

In an article by Peter Pfann, DL2BNU (German language only)of the Bavarian Contest Club, there is a chart of test results as conducted by DL2BNU. Peter’s chart, page 3, shows the measured insertion loss for most of the filters on each band, lacking only measurements for the I.C.E. filters on 80m or 160m. His chart highlights some of the trade-offs. The Dunestars have better attenuation outside the pass band, but at the cost of higher insertion losses. The I.C.E. filters are least expensive and have low insertion losses in the pass band, but generally show slightly less useful attenuation in the adjacent bands.

I expect to need two sets of filters. I’d like to have them for exploring SO2R as well as for use at Field Day and IOTA. All of that operating is at low power. So – a low pass band insertion loss is desirable.The other significant considerations include total cost, availability of suitable components and materials, and ease of assembly. Finally – they need to add value by !FILTERING! That’s the whole point, right?

Proceed to Part 2 -Band Pass Filter Fever – Untangling The Web, or follow some of these additional references below.

****

****

Primary web references:

The Nashoba Valley Amateur Radio Club, the NVARC “Ugly” filter project, by W1FP and KD1LE.

 

Article by Peter Pfann, DL2BNU of the Bavarian Contest Club, a construction project write up on building the W3NQN filters.

RF Filters, ARRL Technical Information service page with filter definitions and article references

Band-Pass Filters for HF Transceivers by Lou Gordon K4VX QST September 1988

W3LPL Receive Only Band Pass filters via K1TTT technical references site.

K2TR Coax Stub Filters via K1TTT technical references site.

K3NA Coaxial stubs via the K1TTT technical reference site

Clean Up Your Signal with Band-Pass Filters, By Ed Wetherhold, W3NQN 1998 ,[ARRL Members only] 2 parts [ –Part 1– , –Part 2– ].

Additional references:

Excellent advice from KG4JJH about building and tuning W3NQN filters.  (added 2012/03/03)

Band Pass Filters for Contesting by Brian Bartlett, VK4UM and John Loftus, VK4EMM

QST Product Review of Dunestar commercial filters Dunestar Model 600 Multiband Bandpass Filter, QST March 1995

Dunestar bandpass filters

Array Solutions commercial filters based on W3NQN QST article June 1998

Industrial Communication Engineers LTD, ICE commercial bandpass
filters

Inexpensive Interference Filters by Alan Bloom N1AL, QST June 1994 (ARRL members only)

Narrow Bandpass Filter [ARRL Members only] article in QEX by William E Sabin W0IYH

Band Reject Filters by AF4Z

amended, 9/15/2008(tnx K9ZW!) :

“Managing Interstation Interference – Coaxial Stubs and Filters” by George Cutsogeorge, W2VJN, available in hardcopy from International Radio for only $15 USD.

amended, 3/31/2010:

K9YC, Some Q&A About Coax and Stubs for your HF Station. Good stuff.

Amended 9/30/2010: Fixed links broken by ARRL website re-design


Circular Link-amended, 7/06/2009:

This excursion into filters turned into a series of musings, so there is more on the process andmethods of discovery as I re-invented the wheel. It is a circular link because it also takes you back here. Oh No!

 

50 Years of IC

This collection of ones and zeros brought to you courtesy of IC’s, 50 years young. Not to mention all of the other wiz-bang gadgets….. like modern radios!

Shelby 2008

Well, the new site for the Shelby hamfest has possibilities, but it seems many of the normal indoor vendorsabandonedthe fest this year. I don’t know if it was due to limited indoor area, or just a convenient time for them to hit the exits, but that’s how it appeared to me.

The outdoor flea market was still well attended, and that was after a several day period of heavy rains. The rain must have given some folks pause, because the flea was spread out over a lot of area, mostly grassy fields. But I was happy to see so many had come out anyway. Hopefully the larger vendors will come back too – even in a reduced form after a forced relocation, it is still one of the better ham fests locally. It will be nice if it can build back up to its previous level. Perhaps they will better luck with the weather next year.

Gustav Radar Imagery

The local station(WWL) back home has a radar map centered over my hometown. I’ll get to see if the eye wall passes through the old stompin’ grounds. As the coast subsides, the flooding gets worse with every storm. I think Port Fourchon and Grand Isle are both in jeopardy of being cut off soon. An excellent time to be “from” Louisiana rather than “in” Louisiana.

Good luck y’all.

K2 Impressions – Part 6 – K2 vs K3

After spending some time operating the K3, I’ve been trying to decide how I liked it. Truthfully, I liked it a lot.

But I must also admit that I still feel like the K2 is a better fit for my own purposes.

Unfortunately, I haven’t done a side by side comparison, and all of my judgements are subjective and anecdotal rather than measured scientifically. But one does not operate a rig scientifically, one hunkers down and spins the dial, looking for the pearls amidst the flotsam and jetsam.

The K3 variable bandwidth and bandwidth shift features are outstanding. I really enjoyed operating the NAQP with the K3. Its receiver is every bit as good as anything else I’ve heard. But I think the K2 holds its own against big brother. Without a side by side A/B test, it seems the receive quality was very similar.

The K3 has many features the K2 lacks. It will have a true second receiver. There are also the RTTY and CW features. Etc., etc. Some of the ergonomics are better on the K3. But for my own uses I won’t normally need most of the additional features. The K2 receiver, with the DSP filters, is very close to the level of the K3. So, for my own part, an upgrade would not pay for itself.

None of that is really a knock on the K3. It is more an indication of how much I’m enjoying the K2. I just prefer the simplicity of the K2, and its performance on the bands is very close to top notch. I would probably buy a second K2 if it came down to brass tacks.

If money were no object, the stack in the shack would be K3, Orion, Omni-VII, K2, Omni-VI+,Omni-V, sorted by how well I like their receivers, not by the most loaded. But to contest on a budget, the list re-sorts as K2, Omni-VI+,Omni-V,Omni-VII,K3,Orion. Maybe wedge the FT-1000mp in between the Omni VI+ and the Omni V. Maybe.

K2 and K3 don’t need much desk space either. Omni-VII comes close to their size, but is not quite that compact.

So, K2 is going to be a long term keeper, no matter what else might eventually move into the KazShack down the log.

– more – at the K2 Impressions page

2008 NAQP SSB – M/2 as NC4KW @ N1LN

Many thanks to Bruce and Laurie for hosting the group. I know I had a great time operating their station.

For NAQP SSB I was part of that group, including N1LN, N1YXU, NT4D, KA1ARB and myself, W4KAZ. We operated Multi-2 from the N1LN station under the NC4KW call sign. Final score 195,880 with 1180 QSO’s and 166 mults before log checking.

Bruce let us show up a bit early to give us a few quick lessons on the station. This was the first time any of the group has guest op’ed at their location, so its going to take a few stabs to get all of the ducks in a row. Despite the new situations, everything seemed to go pretty well. Murphy refused to put in an appearance, despite the green ops. The easy station layout helped.

The equipment was all functioning as expected, and the antennas seem to play as well as I expected, i.e., much, much better than my few simple wire antennas strung out from the KazShack. We didn’t do a lot of jockeying the antennas, but it didn’t really seem necessary. Conditions were the least cooperative aspect of the weekend, as 10m and 15m did not open as we had hoped they might. The low band noise levels were high, as the storms seemed to be plopped right in our

At the outset, we started on 20m and 15m but the lack of any signs of life on 15m made that seem a futile waste of time. So the 15m station moved down to 40m. But even 40m was slow. 20m was the best band at the outset but rates there were not very high either. 40m began showing signs of life as folks seemed to begin migrating down due to conditions. When NT4D turned the 40m station over to me, I noticed the rate had been creeping up there. At some point after I turned it over to KA1ARB, the 40m station got out ahead of the 20m station.

Closing in on the 400 QSO point before dinner time, I was over on the 20m station and N1LN was on the 40m station. Bruce had hit a lull, and 20m activity picked up a bit. I finally got the 20m station caught up at 190 Q’s each, but N1LN soon had a flurry of QSO’s on 40m, and didn’t look back. When Bruce and I gave up the chairs to catch a bite to eat, we could hear NT4D and KA1ARB tearing into the after-dinner pileups. Rob was having good rates on 40m, and we had our best rates of the contest then.

As the evening progressed 40m mostly kept delivering a slow but steady trickle of QSO’s. Later in the evening I moved the 20m station down to 80m, and still later down to 160m as rates on 20m slowed.

Overall I probably operated about six hours total. Without a formal plan, I think the team was good at giving up the chair for the other ops to participate. At the end, I was begging someone to pull teeth on 160m. That was a bit too much of a grind.

I think the N1LN station is going to become well known in the Multi op and M/2 classes, and Bruce is going to have a blast operating SO2R. Their station plays well on 40m and 20m. I’ll need to reserve opinion on 15m and 10m. The K3 is a damn strong radio, and it seems to be a S&P op’s dream rig, given the filtering.

It seems like the propagation favored the Gulf coast, based on the huge score reported to the 3830 reflector by NX5M and by W5KFT. Those guys really kicked butt on 20m. I suspect W5WMU will also turn in a good score. But I think for a maiden voyage shakedown cruise, we probably did pretty well as NC4KW. The propagation for NAQP from our NC QTH sure didn’t deliver that extra 1300 Q’s we would have needed to win, but I think we will be competitive with the regional stations.

We shall see, as I expect to be ready to grab the mike and make some noise as often as I am welcome to join the fun.

I hope that coincides with good propagation soon!

Zero, With a Mean of….

From todays K7RA propagation forecast:

“”Sunspot numbers for August 7 through 13 were 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, and0 with a mean of 0.””

Well.

Whoop- tee -doo….

And odds are several months more of that excitement is sure to follow. Ick.